Press ReleaseMay | 21 | 2024
Increasing Life Expectancy for Youth with HIV Requires More Than Just Adherence to Care Regimens
Key Takeaways
- Mass General study projects life expectancy gaps of 10.4 years and 11.8 years for male and female youths, respectively, living with HIV compared to individuals without HIV
- Life expectancy improves for youth who acquired HIV at birth when current care and treatment guidelines are actively followed
- Additional social and structural interventions are likely required to improve life expectancy for youth who acquired HIV in adolescence, as adherence to care did not have the same effects on life expectancy
BOSTON – Life expectancy of youth with HIV is projected to be 10.4 years less in males and 11.8 years less in females compared to individuals without HIV, a study by researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), a founding member of the Mass General Brigham healthcare system, has found.
The research, published in JAMA Health Forum, also reported that careful adherence to HIV care throughout the individual’s lifespan can lead to important gains in life expectancy, and that for some adolescents with HIV, interventions focused on structural and social factors such as poverty and housing could also result in improvements.
“The U.S. has made tremendous strides toward ending the HIV epidemic in recent years, and our study showed that HIV care works especially well if individuals can access timely treatment and stay engaged with it over their lifetimes,” says lead author Anne Neilan, MD, MPH, a physician investigator in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital.
“Particularly for youth who acquired HIV in adolescence, the lower life expectancy seen with HIV may relate more to other causes of mortality than HIV itself, since current treatment is so effective.”
Nearly 46,000 people in the U.S. ages 13 to 24 are living with HIV, which can damage the immune system, making the body more susceptible to infections and some cancers.
In their study, MGH investigators looked at two youth cohorts: One that acquired HIV around the time of birth (perinatally); and the other that acquired HIV in adolescence (non-perinatally).
They used mathematical simulation modeling and U.S. national adolescent clinical data to show that youth with HIV acquired at birth were projected to have life expectancy losses of 10.4 years (for boys and young men) and ll.8 years (for girls and young women) compared to youth without HIV.
Life expectancy losses were even higher for youth with HIV acquired in adolescence: 15.0 years for boys and young men, and 19.5 years for girls and young women.
The study also showed that when given ideal HIV care, life expectancy losses were projected to improve substantially for youth with HIV acquired at birth ( 0.5 years for boys and young men, and 0.6 years for girls and young women). With ideal care for youth with HIV acquired in adolescence, life expectancy losses also improved, but not as much with persistent project losses of 6.0 years (for boys and young men) and 10.4 years (for girls and young women) .
“Particularly for youth who acquired HIV at time of birth, their projected similar life expectancies to youth without HIV in an ideal care scenario illustrates the importance of lifelong antiretroviral therapy and care engagement,” notes Neilan.
“For the group who acquired HIV in adolescence, we projected a substantial gap in life expectancy compared to their HIV-at-birth counterparts, even after ideal HIV care,” she says
“We believe this difference is not attributable to HIV itself, but rather to systemic, social and behavioral factors, and that these must be addressed to improve life expectancy for this higher risk group.”
Those factors include poverty, housing, insurance eligibility, transportation, health system fragmentation, and HIV stigma, the researcher elaborated.
“Life expectancy is a key population health indicator,” emphasizes Neilan, “and our study underscores the significant work that needs to be done in HIV care and treatment for adolescents with HIV if they’re to benefit the same way adults have from the striking progress in recent years in HIV diagnosis and treatment.”
Neilan is an infectious disease specialist at MGH and assistant professor of Pediatrics and Medicine at Harvard Medical School. Senior author Kunjal Patel, MD, is a senior research scientist in Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Co-authors include Andrea Ciaranello, MD, MPH, physician investigator in the Medical Practice Evaluation Center, MGH, and associate professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and Kenneth Freedberg, MD, director, Medical Practice Evaluation Center, and professor of Medicine, HMS.
The study was funded by NICHD and the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions.
-
- Infectious Diseases
- Department of Medicine
Type
Centers and Departments
Topics
Check out the Mass General Research Institute blog
Bench Press highlights the groundbreaking research and boundary-pushing scientists working to improve human health and fight disease.
Support Research at Mass General
Your gift helps fund groundbreaking research aimed at understanding, treating and preventing human disease.
About Massachusetts General Hospital
Massachusetts General Hospital, founded in 1811, is the original and largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. The Mass General Research Institute conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the nation, with annual research operations of more than $1 billion and comprises more than 9,500 researchers working across more than 30 institutes, centers and departments. MGH is a founding member of the Mass General Brigham healthcare system.